/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15947311
it's real

>>15838000
>String Theory
Despite me being a big proponent of the [math] \mathbb{PHENOTYPE}[/math], string theory has more or less been floundering for over a decade.
>but they are mathematically consistent
It would also be good if they were physically consistent as well

>>15838022
Gravity does exist on the quantum level, the problem is the incongruity of General Relativity having no fixed spacetime background while quantum mechanics does.

>>15833971
>newfig detected

>>15139261
holy mother of cope

>>15117775
[math]\mathbb{PHENOTYPE}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{H}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{E}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{N}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{O}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{T}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{Y}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{P}[/math]
[math]\mathbb{E}[/math]

let's go lads

I'm not entirely sure, however, I do know that /sci/ is facing /gd/ in the round of 16 of the 2022 Spring Babby Cup, relatively soon, you can catch that here:

https://isthisliv.com/4cc/stream.html

I think you are on to something OP

>>12744773
>Well then what are they attracted to?
What women 'round the world crave,
drawn towards it's gravitational wave.

Plebeian brainlets young and old,
are never free of getting told.

This cranial giant has it all,
above all those who's heads are small.

IQ tests are only needed,
when circumference goes unheeded.

Genotype comes no where close,
while [math] \mathbb{PHENOTYPE!} [/math] can always boast.

CS sperglords start to cry,
when this Ashkenazim walks on by.

Engineer goys try not to mind,
when it solves problems ahead of time.

Cerebral thirst thats only sated,
when theorems numerous are created.

Mastery of physics is his right,
as is obvious at first sight.

There is no time for popsci tripe,
for he has the [math] \mathbb{PHENOTYPE!} [/math]

What if we feel shame when we masterabate because long ago some women didn't like that so the ones that could hear her coming were also better hunters so they had kids and past two traits on

this thread is literally philosophy tier. I am not convinced that the notion of free will is well defined, or can even be defined in terms of notions which are themselves well defined. It is a word game in which we get lost, a puzzle constructed out of pure language with no consequential referents to pin down. No substance at all to this discourse. You're all pathetic brainlets, log off sci you pathetic niggers.

Why do so many people, including on this board, completely exaggerate our current level of scientific understanding and technological sophistication?

It's alright to be low-IQ, you guys don't have to be so mad. Not everyone can have the superior PHENOTYPE, after all.

>>11548803
Why, the PHENOTYPE, of course.

Weinstein is a phenotype wannnabe. The cranium is just not there, sorry Eric...

/ and * are not mixed associative so that expression makes about as much sense as [math] i\times j\times j [/math]

M-Theory

>>11215201
you have my [math]\mathcal{P \ H \ E \ N \ O \ T \ Y \ P \ E}[/math]

>this thesis you've submitted is wholly inadequate, it says here in the abstract that you develop a causal set formalism for QG. That's totally absurd, here's an equation for you to consider: [math] you \ = \ \eta i g^{2}\epsilon R [/math]

how does sci respond?

P H E N O T Y P E

This thesis you've written here....It strains coherence, this is ridiculous, it says here that you've cited Lee Smolin and Peter Woit? Get out of my office immediately, you incompetent nigger.

how does sci respond?

[math] \mathbb{ P ~ H ~ E ~ N ~ O ~ T ~ Y ~ P ~ E } [/math]

>>10869383
iq tests are only needed when circumference goes unheeded

>He doesn't have engineers, scientists, and mathematicians in his family
>His genes haven't been carefully selected for intelligence through multiple generations
Never gonna make it.