/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6709465
Not exactly. You can't effective have eyes over every square inch at every given moment. And because of that, it gives cryptofags enough leeway to slide the goalpost ("oh, well you searched the forest, but maybe bigfoot was hiding the whole time").

And saying "they don't exist until proven otherwise" is also more parsimonious. Positive assumptions require positive evidence

See: Karl Popper


Annnyyywaaayyy
There are still big ass theropods running around out there

>>6662954
>Kulindadromeus
What taxa is part of?