/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8634960
>>8632648
>>>8632517
>That IPCC report is from 1990. You do realize this is almost 30 years old now, right? This graph you posted is literally the ONLY climatological graph I can find that uses ESMR satellite data, maybe there's an actual reason that data is not used today and it starts in 1979?
>It's really sad how you have to go all the way back to 1990 to cherrypick a chart to confirm your biases. Sea ice decline in the arctic is a reality.
>Look at this video, understand how the thickest sea ice that takes years, decades to accumulate is diminishing at a rapid rate, increasing every year.
>You want to view ESMR data, here you go:
>Look at my cherry picked statistics.

Above, I illustrated how grossly distorted this "the sky is falling" crap is.
Again, go back and look here: >>8629698

And what of sea ice thickness? Keeping in mind that the Arctic and Antarctic sea ice levels oscillate counter-cyclically.

Look at the massive increase in thick sea ice in the Arctic (thickness increases as colors go from cool to warm). Again, you've got to go straight to the data instead of watching cherry picked, give us more money videos.

Source, Danish Meteorological Institute
2015: http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/images/FullSize_CICE_combine_thick_SM_EN_20150804.png
2016: http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/images/FullSize_CICE_combine_thick_SM_EN_20160804.png