/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14857433
fundamentally they are information
in a literal sense they are solutions, self-evident solutions in a fuzzy, constrained quantized view of a, in our minds, (multi)field existence
the field is in all
and they are some point values, not abstractly, but literally. their literal embodiment is that of a point value, they are a point value, and they embody a point value
matter is made of these things, so to ask what these things are made of, is a weird thing to say
they are not _made_ of things
they are informational data points in a field
> that's weird
yes the field is weird, and that so many points in the fields, with the rules that exist (the rules themselves are nuts) - create other weird things
the thing is matter seems normal to us
but matter is no more normal that the things below matter
quantum isn't weird
nothing is erased
time doesn't exist
entanglement isn't just normal, it's boring and required, in fact it's a LIMITATION
"spooky action" and "delayed choices" and "wave like" is all fucking shit
> is it a wave of a particle
is WHAT a wave of a particle?
you are not talking about the same thing
light isn't one thing
it's a field of unquantized energy that moves around, takes two paths, and because time doesn't exist, light can event ("collapse") at the point where you detect it, but the underlying field of number values still permeated
the way in which things collapse and pull out of the field is fascinating and THIS is something we've not really looked at because we can't see it
but I think there are ways to see it
by forcing the creating of certain particles and trying to saturate the limits of the creation of these particles
or playing with very specific energies of EM waves around those frequencies and materials and seeing how you can show a limitation of close proximity emissions
like a shadow of inverse probability around one emission
this is akin to the domain wall limitations we've seen, and these are hyper local interesting constraints