/sci/ - Science & Math

communication studies isn't science; it's marketing. not even just a meme field, but a forced meme field. that professor at the Mizzou protest who was caught on camera calling for students to rough up a journalist? yup, she's a communications prof.

what did he say made it false? did he put up a slide showing that things were warmer ~600kya? if so, point out that it's not the temperatures that are unprecedented, but rather the rate of warming in the absence of natural forcings towards warming. or did he repeat the critique of the statistical methodology used by Mann et al. as articulated by McIntyre and McKitrick? (the one claiming that the methodology used would turn random noise into a hockey stick.) because McIntyre and McKitrick are a businessman and an economist, not statisticians or climatologists, and the statistical errors were minor. also, Mann had since moved on to a different methodology that returned the same general results.

>>7642412
>Nothing you said justifies cooling adjustments.
Except for
>Time of observation changes...instrument changes, and station relocations
English motherfucker, do you read it?

>[homogenization] biases the entire dataset accordingly to your homogenization standards.
Is that what they call "removing outliers" these days?

>3 are subject to extreme UHI, 1 is a rural station.
>After Homogenization I have 4 graphs with extreme UHI traits. I just destroyed my only accurate dataset. And you're defending this practice?
implying that climatologists don't correct for UHI effects
>after I explained that they actually do about ten times
>it's like you stubbornly believe that climatologists are unable to measure, account for, and correct for sampling artifacts
I shiggy diggy doo dah

>>7629580

headcanon accepted

fagets better learn 2 tits