/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5995103

OMG 4 REALL?

Thanks for the insight you fucking derelict.

I've always hated doing boring labs, but I've somehow never had difficulty writing the reports when I've sat down to do them. I've always wondered how to read/write scientific literature since there's a lotta cool shit to read about that's over my general knowledge so I can understand the overall point but none of the specifics. I just realized that writing lab reports is just practicing the basics for writing scientific papers, and that the terminology and shit will just come with time. I'm kinda stoked right now.

Just thought I should share.

>>3986321

>People had iq's lower than 190

>>3123510
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

>>3076848

Oskee Wow Wow

>>2473545
>I'll do it again!

Okay /sci/, I need some help with Physics. I've been trying to do it for awhile and can't figure it out. It's projectile motion.

-An object is thrown from the top of a tower that is 115 meters high. The initial horizontal speed of the objects is 5.70 m/s and there is no initial vertical component of speed.

a) What is the velocity of the object at t=2.50 sec?
b) What is the displacement of the object at t=3 seconds?
c) How far from the base of the tower will the object land?

For A, I took acceleration, which in this case is -9.8 since the object is traveling down. Now I took the -9.8 and multiplied it by the 2.50 to get an answer of -24.5. Then I added the 5.7 to get -18.8, which I thought was the answer it the answer key says it is 25.

Help?

Guys
He's gunna show us a picture of a naked gurl

GUYS HES GONNA SHOW US A NAKED WOMAN

>>2159249