/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12144624
The expected profit is just [math]50 (100 + n)[/math], where [math]n[/math] is the number of "overbooks", minus [math]60 P(X = 101) + 60^2 P(X = 101) \ldots 60^n P(X = 100 + n)[/math], that is, the various possible overbooking penalties.
I don't think it has a closed form, although you might be able to compute it recursively.
>>12145465
He posted his discord here once or twice, you can always look through the archives for it if you really miss him.
>>12144670
Oh yeah, didn't even notice. Updated ones below:
Meme charts:https://imgur.com/a/JY6NNeL
Serious charts: https://imgur.com/a/0qDEgYt
Amazing that you could somehow tell that the statistics chart I made in two minutes was missing.
>>12145112
Seems right to me.
The probability that we take [math]k + n[/math] tries to achieve a success given that we've already failed the first [math]n - 1[/math] should be just the probability of us achieving success on the [math]k[/math]-th try, innit?

>>11956250
Are they really, tho?