[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.3659604 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

What does the de broglie wavelength of a particle(or, say, of a person) actually mean?

>> No.3277503 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3277503

>>3277440
1) It depends which way gravity is
2) The rod breaks
3) The rod breaks

\thread

>> No.3147688 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3147688

>>3147482
1) Ehh, its a neat thing to think about that, but uttterly pointless right now

2) This is true, we actually use that shit in calculations all the time, it is basically what you get if you directly interpret the mathematics used. Feynman was a huge proponent of these beliefs. Most physicist are fine with this, although there are still a few who "deny it".

3)
>Suppose _random fairytale bullshit_ what happens?

Massive things can't don't move at c (in the manner you talk about). You are talking about fairytales, like Santa Clause or god, not science.

4) A blackhole formed at the LHC would disintergrate very rapidly.

5) Huh?

>> No.3002679 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3002679

>>3002595
That is how shit works.

NOT EVERYTHING HAS AN "EASY" CLASSICAL ANALOGY DUMBFUCK.

>> No.2564896 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2564896

>>2564824
>Why can't I into math?

You have a low IQ, and shitty parents

\thread

>> No.2551535 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2551535

>>2550198
Wow, the fucking thread rate on /sci/ has jumped up signfigantly

Anyway, yeah I see what you are trying to say. The problem is you are talking a very narrow approach, you are just using some very very elementary physics (approximations) you learned last term, and assuming that shit is applicable. Try looking at the big picture, and all physics knowledge as a whole.

I can derive all the B shit from, SR and E fields. Likewise then derive all the E shit from QED, stat mech, and particle physics.

In the end c will be the fundmental property, off which I derive my magnegic and electric constants.

>> No.2372893 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2372893

>>2372825
>then why arent we expanding? our bodies, homes, car, everything

Who said you weren't? Imagine I enlarge a pic on my computer. From the perspective of the pic, the pic doesn't change.

As long as the proportians stay the same, the pic views itself as the same.

>> No.2264968 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2264968

>>2264858
Yes, I work on the CMS as well. I guess I will see you in June. You will be what we call a "summer student". I await the opportunity to haze you ....lol.

My only advise is to bring own power outlet converter. The ones they sell at the little store on site are expensive as fuck! And good luck trying to find cheap stuff in Gevena! Rich Arabs everywhere!

>> No.1243821 [View]
File: 14 KB, 400x495, 17306_de_broglie-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1243821

>>1242854
"I do not have a problem with the engineer, as long as he doesn't talk about gay sex in my lab" - De Broglie

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]