/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12752342
Pic related

It's honestly one of those things beyond a source as the fact that carbon dioxide has specific levels of absorption into water and the subsequent kinetics of it forming carbonic acid are very well known.

Prediction here, a plastic cycle will start as animals lose that bility to use calcium carbonate in their shells and replace it with plastic instead which is more pH agnostic.

>>10727075
>If I repeat boomer talking points I can also pretend there won't be problems before I keel over

>>10225027
>we should be subsidizing desert farming techniques
That's something we need to be careful with. If you made the Sahara green, for example, it could kill the Amazon. The rainforest is fertilized by dust that blows across the ocean.

>we should be building camps
Hmmmm....

>we should be building thousands of fission plants
This is what we need really, but people are too afraid of nuclear.

>>10225096
CO2 is part of the pollution. For some reason, we have allowed the discussion to be about climate change rather than "should industry just be allowed to pollute as much as they want?".

Reminder that arguing over climate change happening or not and being anthropogenic or not and being a bad thing or not is a big distraction from the bigger issues. We know for certain that pumping CO2 into the air is a bad thing in other ways. There's no need to care about the climate to care about reducing CO2 emissions.

>>10115390
>implying the only issue with unrestrained pollution is climate