/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8947821
There is a direct correlation between being right wing/conservative and wealth. As in, the more to the right you lean the more successful and wealthy you are likely to be. Intelligence and IQ are too abstract to measure precisely and accurately, where as wealth is exact and so is a MUCH better statistic to make comparisons with.

Also, if you adjust the stats so it's only whites vs whites then you will see right leaning whites edging out left leaning whites. Libtards always rig studies by getting as many Asians as possible on their side to skew the numbers. They also leave out hispanics due to the survey being only done in english, skewing the numbers further. This is why you have to compare people of the same ethnicity to get an accurate reading.

>>8947829
Mose people in academia are there only because they couldn't hack it in the private sector, or they work in a bullshit field which has no real world applications like women's studies.

>>8947846
Wrong on all accounts.

>>8948563
He said the opposite you moron, recognizing that you can't change the system doesn't mean you can't control your own life. On the contrary knowing that the system is useless compels ones to seek greater personal responsibility instead of relying on others.

>>8682223
>>8682086
>>8682039
>>8682047
>IT TOTALLY 100% DOESN'T EXIST!
>provides zero proof or sources to back claim

This is why /sci/ fucking sucks. Just delete this shit board already.

>>7757922
>>I thought that was the case when I had just started school again.
>You thought right.
False statement; I explained why it was otherwise.

>> Then I realized I have no school debt,
>Smart kids have scholarships and corporate bursaries (yes, you can get them at 18, most big companies do it at top high-schools), but that's beside the point.
I still don't have school debt. We all take different paths. Seems like you want to argue for the sake of arguing.

>> I have a real salary, my company is paying my education @$5k/yr for as long as I like taking classes even beyond my degree (can be a lifetime student :D),
>Right, but you could've been earning a higher engineering salary for the last 3 years and be earning it for the next 4 instead of your current while you study.
I know you think engineers start off at 6 figures, but that is a statistical anomaly and an incorrect assumption. Starting wage, is actually between ~60-70k. Once you pay your dues and learn your company's operations you will probably advance to 90k if you show promise (2-3 years probably). The key statement being "IF". Not all people ascend to higher levels. 80/20 rule. 80% stay in the title they first enter under for the majority of their lives. 20% will advance.

>>7693086