/sci/ - Science & Math

(1/2)
First time back on this shitty site in probably a decade, but I needed to shitpost about a recent development in my life. I considered /b/, but those crayon-munchers would probably not understand some of the relevant science, so I’m here with a good old-fashioned greentext
>be me
>3rd year chem undergrad
>have a microbiologist friend who is a few years older than me
>tldr his life may as well have been written by Hunter S. Thompson with all the nonsense he’s been involved in. He’s my token QAnon friend
>more about him in another post
>microbiologist friend says “hey, want a job?”
>I ask for the details, since any opportunity to get your initial 2 years of industry experience is something you gotta jump on it
>it’s a QC chemistry position at a cosmetics manufacturer he used to work at
>tldr this place has featured in many of his vignettes, and the way things work there seem dysfunctional at best
>tfw the director of QC reached out directly to my micro friend asking if he knew anyone that could fill the position
>realize this means they’ve been completely passed over by every fresh-faced Patel with a B.S.
>think I might be better off holding out for something that isn’t obviously scuffed
>remember I’m a broke-ass undergrad
>fuck it, we’re doing it live
>go in for the interview, look nice
>meet with the director of QC, a nice little Chinese lady
>talk to her about how I cum fucking buckets whenever I get to make a calibration curve
>this pleases her

>>12765172
You got absolutely destroyed, just stop posting.

>>12735523
>Too bad the data doesn't say anything and nothing but interpretations exist.
Your interpretation bears no relation to the data and doesn't make sense.

>It would not have
Wrong. https://www.pnas.org/content/104/41/16016.abstract


>it would have released millions of tons of water vapor into the atmosphere
How does releasing millions of tons of water vapor cause temperatures to be stable for 10000 years and then rapidly increase? It's a very simple question that you can't answer because your bullshit makes no sense.

>I didn't say it was causing warming now.
>The current warming that the human race has enjoyed the last 12k years is from the Younger Dryas impact.
Why are you lying?

>I said the warming effect from the impact wore of after the Medieval warming period.
Global temperatures were stable before, after and during the MWP. Warming at the end of the YD ended 10000 years ago. So really what you're telling me is that the supposed YD impact caused interglacial warming, not current warming, which would require the Milankovich cycle to for some reason not be causing the interglacial warming even though that is exactly what it should have been doing at that point in the cycle. Pure nonsense.

>>12501865
>confusing the amount of nines with the number they represent
lol

>>12484050
>>12484056
>>12484066
>>12484070
>>12484074
>>12484085
>>12484089
Nice shitposting, schizo.

>>12432011
>I have shown the existence of any back-radiation would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics; heat only transfers from hot to cold or from high intensity radiators to lower intensity radiators.
Blankets violate the 2nd law! Blankets don't exist!

>>12425509

>>12397987
Your Fields medal is in the mail.

>>12387458
>Trump's success

>>12321621
>base 10 is holy

>>12306708
I've cornered this deniertard into literal contradictions

>insulators don't insulate!

>>12116448
>you're cherrypicking
>just ignore the videos and take the witness testimony at face value

>>11944871
>Anyone notice anything about what their last names are lacking in?
PhD in physics

>>11882383
Let X be false
Then X is false

Amazing.

>>11875594
>every other thread is a eu schizo spam
>but calling them trash is the problem

>>11875365
Because philosophy can't answer the major philosophical questions.

>>11871997
>2/3 is infinite

>>11717587

Every vote is wrong

>>11666131
>please provide a photograph of the operation to remove evidence of war crimes

>>11610654
So by your "logic" 1-2^2 = 14

>>11601079
>Disprove a statement equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis
Gee I wonder why no one will do this and instead asks you to prove your own claim?

>>11596759
>If I ignore current warming it doesn't exist, thus proving warming is not correlated with CO2

>>11559299
>Do you realize your opinion is at odds with thousands of engineers and architects who are part of AEFT?
LOL, do you realize your opinion is at odds with hundreds of thousands of engineers and architects who aren't a part of AEFT?

>Your denial of their investigation into the real causes of the buildings collpasing at free-fall speed into their own footprints is equivalent to people who deny human-influenced global warming despite there being an overwhelming consensus among geologists, oceanographers and other environmental scientists that we are contributing to it.
Ooof, that schizo lack of awareness...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition