/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9621463
>[citation needed]
The probabilistic nature of black hole evaporation, radioactive element half-life and the quantum foam mean you can never align the matter in the universe to achieve equal conditions. There is also "inaccesible" matter past the light horizon.
>I'm not a lump of brain.
"Subjectivity" is another one of those metaphysical abstractions. Everything you do functions objectively and purely physically thus you can't detach it into another category.
>concept of circle
The concept is irrelevant since the circle is defined physically throught its existence. It doesn't matter how you define it since it's real. I can't say the same for consciousness, which has no objective physical definition.
>senses are objective
Considering they are completely dependant on physical interactions to work, yes.
>what's the difference between non-existent and illusory?
None. Both are just a neuron configuration in your brain that don't reflect the condition of physical objects.
>nobody said consciousness necessarily impacts the physical world
How do you assert its existence if it doesn't impact the physical world and isn't objectievly defined through physics?

>sit in on signal processing class to see how much of a joke engineering classes are
>professor says Dirac Delta "function"