/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15552412
No, but a lot of its fans are

>>9070709
>Gizmodo
At least try and get your news from IEEE.org

>>9013034
>>9013041
>>9013199
>>9013578
>t. underage that's never been on a farm
Plus you fags are ignoring the fact that they have to simulate muscle movenent for the cultured meat in order to stimulate growth, necessitating the use of extremely complicated machinery to "give the meat a workout." It still consumes large amounts of nutrients, except instead of coming from grass which is free, they now come from very expensive and labor-intensive pharmaceutical grade supplies. This whole thing is a farce and cattle are extremely easy to care for because they largely oversee their own development.

Pic related: it's you.

>>9004781

>>9001483

>>8995836
>you dont understand

>>8979567
>Reminder that the future is in augmented intelligence, not artificial intelligence.
And how do you propose that is going to work? Now instead of just developing AI systems you have two problems: developing AI systems AND interfacing them with really complicated biology.

Pic related is you.

>>8952668
Fuck off.

>>8945275
Oh look, another one of these threads.

>>8926046
found it in google pics

>>8064830
The main technical challenge from a 4chan perspective is that you're asking a question that attracts futurists, but ultimately needs a passing familiarity with industrial engineering to answer.

more pants-on-head retardation from the transhumanist crowd

>>7366320
Clearly it's because the statement "True AI is the key that will unlock everything else" is a faulty one.

>>7366339
>Everyone who is scientifically litterate knows it's possible since we ourself are hardware with such capacity.
Since when are humans superintelligent beings? Of the humans that currently exist a very very small fraction of them can program a computer and an even smaller fraction know how to create a rudimentary AI. Why is it assumed that another human-level intelligence thrown into the mix will make any sort of difference.

The singularitarianist narrative is so riddled with logical gaps it's a wonder anyone can honestly believe it.

>>7357478
oh god, the pop-sci is real

>>7336372
>>7336381
>>7336389
>>7336393
also if this is your idea for a sci-fi novel or something you should seriously consider dropping it because this is the stupidest thing i've ever read

transhumanists are some of the dumbest people on the planet i'm constantly surprised by how retarded the things they write are

What is it about A.I. that attracts the lowest common denominator of lazy, stupid, arrogant retards willing to run their mouths about shit that they literally have no fucking clue about?

>>7268244
>This is what manchildren actually believe

>>7253611
Now I know you're full of shit.

>>7246727
And I'm going to assume that you're one of these types.

>>7170536

i've concluded the same thing with progress towards strong AI. i'm currently studying by playing video games every day. wish me luck!

>>6965964