/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5566174
>This is a studied, many-decades-long evaluation of a psychological interest.

Then provide your data set. I'd like to see just how many people you surveyed.

>Then why can't you just swing the discussion that way, instead of insisting it's all fruitless nonsense? Good God, you are saying you SUPPORT this idea!

I have been saying this entire time that colonizing the large rocks is impractical because of the atmosphere and gravity wells. When those are absent, why wouldn't i support colonization? I don't see it being likely that we would have people living on ceres, but it's a hell of a lot more practical than having people living on that shitball mars.

>I just read it, above! YOU SAID IT, several times!

We may have misunderstood each other.

>It would be sweet of you, really, to stop talking down to your superiors.

mfw

Hello, good people of /sci/.
I haz a math question I need help with, because my teacher is a fool. However, rather than have you answer it, I would like to be able to understand it.

If I have to make a cone with a volume of 600cm cubed, with the smallest total surface area possible, how would I set about doing this?

Any help would be much appreciated.

name impresiveness factor