/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4526760
oh, nice. I just read the paragraph in tractatus 1h ago. I didn't know that statement made into a expression.

c=3988176964329644992742845821537720250079430440578360638514753585768708\
6137929603198643623963481355660494932944012482532245757397784735013920\
3828949217699481073554624236182534472783944498957261115198233192527116\
2705245989861631083098502414784485455864241749885138575784297303397576\
8373775463327476921287920090879096642530684779248792880761069334420690\
3788007238338936217504780686736621850803777685447822180892970174579685\
5667221022546045800827584431623681528408657045583028553842971029361912\
6183847842110200602141663949658597856431617143742169505015434190186412\
1205798169820542091103450484268039189409333186998563087655262011765279\
2099861557127895170352145650535954768812357507727339211886364688451762\
4000146120200065196828461660090788220392984740043614711167883879716989\
7075600022080678574821231594164359014554157837101761443323408804541776\
5430130285489921756495259575063962994932276939944399907407708738200429\
1477045219843868992721417359082063439702211271142268332494328495076845\
9442673103790672931675613857338888296866788067109175754539544900149206\
48387949140380475916337694113792

If you define what that means sure.
For example, if the wave is goverend by a (simpler) differential equation that you can reconstruct a lagrangian density, compute the hamiltonian. it's value for your wave equation solution is an associated energy.

>>3858471
what do you mean by "it doesn't really do it"? You can't see the embedding if you only perceive 3 dimensions, but there can still be one.
In general relativity, one has curved 3d space (and you can view it as embedded in some higherdimensional space due to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_embedding_theorem
)
and one of the effects of this curvature is that things come closer after some time (also called gravity)

>>3711390
thx, I'll come back in a couple of hours and read it and respond properly.

>>3702187
lol'd