/sci/ - Science & Math

I'd elov his musk

>>5756458

>made the claims
>Supplied the evidence
>still wont accept it because I've never seen it lel

What the fuck are you getting at

The evidence was not in the thread. Because i said so is not comprehensive evidence.

How is a post detailing the specific and cited reason for this never to have occurred not relevant information. You did repeat yourself many times before coming up with >>5756290

Literally the entire thread i heard these rockets were not powerful enough. Not why, just that they weren't and I'm stupid for not knowing.

The same board that apparently has a hivemind knowledge about soviet space technology from the 60's still believes that the USSR didn't cover up its major failures and deaths within the program.


Am i being tricked? I'm arguing with a man who's arguing against himself and championing his own ignorance.

>mfw Nietzsche was ahead of his time, even today

There cannot be free will or anything that is not predefined because of the simple laws of physics. Atoms behave these laws and only appear to behave otherwise has to do with how we don't have the technology to predict such. It just doesn't make sense that anything can be random. There can't be any free will other than the illusions we have been made by evolution to assume.
Determinism: 1
People who have any point in life: 0
Plus 10, 000 internets to anyone who can prove or give real evidence that I am wrong about this.

>mfw I find psychology to be a perfectly valid field and everyone else is just masturbating their superiority complex

like estrogen?

Give me a good generic name for a blog about science and puddi.

>>1983315
>mfw you dunno what mfw means

>>1188143

>Science isn't for everyone.
>Science is only for people like me, and that makes you pretentious.

Serious question /sci/

From a purely mathematical perspective, because in other fields it usually constitutes as an error, what is Infinity ?