[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16000967 [View]
File: 19 KB, 600x544, 1693328559566.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16000967

>>16000340
>There is no scientific perspective, at least not yet.
>yet
>implying there will be

>> No.15996513 [View]
File: 19 KB, 600x544, 1693318256096.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15996513

>>15996441
>We just have to wait until the scientific technology has advanced enough for us to work it out properly.
Not OP, but when I've seen people say things like this, they typically have faith that Science will give answers to things that science cannot answer, things that are without the scope of science, if only there was "more time", just more time and Science will answer everything.

>> No.10459811 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 19 KB, 600x544, blinded-by-sciencescientismnew-atheism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10459811

who mistakenly believe they're in good company because science

Thinking science can reveal all truth is based on the arrogant notion that there's nothing beyond our comprehension. This, in turn, is founded only in the notion that we already understand stuff, which compared to the infinity of "reality," is a faulty induction, i.e. what there is to understand is entirely irrelevant to what you already understand.

You just can't comprehend the possibility that your greatest works of literature, classical music, or math could be as nothing to godlike aliens (could totally exist because star trek says so) or God (ew no doesn't exist).

To conclude that what we could never comprehend doesn't exist and therefore what we can comprehend is all there is, is the stuff of dumbasses. To worship science as the arbiter of all truth is to worship yourselves.

t. quantum physicist (to out those stupid enough to think it makes a difference)

>> No.9738736 [View]
File: 17 KB, 600x544, scientism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9738736

What are some common buzzwords on this board that should be gotten rid of, like
>scientific method
>artificial intelligence
>soft science

>> No.9618423 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 17 KB, 600x544, blinded-by-sciencescientismnew-atheism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9618423

I sometimes feel that scientists are really disconnected from the science fanbase (the rationalists/skeptics/w.e.)
Scientists are mainly religious people with different philosophical ideas while the science fanbase is dominated by scientism and positivism.

This is bad for two reasons
>the science fanbase gives science a bad rep
>the science fanbase misinterpretes science and misunderstands scientists (they think that scientists are atheist positivists just like them)

What can we do to help?

>> No.9468994 [View]
File: 17 KB, 600x544, blinded-by-sciencescientismnew-atheism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9468994

How does /sci/ feel about scientism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]