/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6903070
You want to know why "believing in magic" is not logically, reasonably, or scientifically valid?

Are you serious? Trolling?

1) Logic
It is not logically valid, because it is nothing but logical fallacies! You can't logic yourself from reality (you and your interactions/observations) "into" magic. Reality -> magic is invalid. There is no inherit connection. Hence, you have to prove magic actually exists first, then prove the connection.

2) Reason
But lets say we don't demonstrate magic, is the belief in it still reasonable? Hell no! Asserting "reality->x" without justification means, you can assert "reality->y" without justification. Aka the reason you have to assume god exists applies equally to Magic unicorn universe creating vampires. Such a system, where you just blindly assert the existence of things, isn't reasonable by any stretch of the imagination.

3) Science
It is not scientifically valid because there is no proof or evidence that magic exist or ever existed. We no magic to observe or interact with!

This shit is really trivial guys. You are literally asking me "why shouldn't I believe in magic unicorn pixies". This isn't rocket science! You already know the fucking answer! Use your goddam brain!