/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12757384
I fully support nuclear, you idiot. Supporting nuclear doesn't mean anything and it doesn't change the fact the nuclear has been stagnant for decades and there is no indication that it will change in the future. The regulatory related costs of new nuclear installations have become so great that it's no longer that cheap a source of energy and even IV reactors may not sway the public.

The realistic solution is to install as much clean energy as possible while using the existing energy production to meet demand during the periods of low renewable production until energy storages prices come down enough to fully phase them out.