/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15319097
>I wonder if its opened its eyes yet...or, like...looked around at all since the big bang...

Which is more realistic efficient solar or Fusion?

Are there any other technologies that are promising?

Same for space travel

Newfag here.
I don't know much about astronomy, but I had this idea going around my head for a while.
Basically I wanted to know if a white hole could have so much mass spread around it in a perfect sphere so it would eventually collapse back into a black hole. Would the white hole be constantly pushing back against the forming black hole, thus allowing for something akin to the process that happens inside stars? Would it allow the fusion of elements higher than Iron? Higher than Uranium? What are your opinions on this /sci?

>>10538848
Lol, Mods are Gods.

>Interstellar
>Good Will Hunting
>A Beautiful Mind
>The Theory of Everything

If it true that when you enter a black hole you become tiny and go back in time to talk to your daughter? What is the scientific basis of this movie?

>>9022820
>what are you going to do with eternal life?

Space Exploration.

Dozens of years to reach neraby stars.
Millions of years for just explore our Galaxy.
The Universe has Billions of Galaxies.

There are plenty of stuff out there on Space to Explore. But Our finite life pose a limit.

If at least we discovered faster than light travel then perhaps long-life would be not so necessary.

But for space exploration a Very Long Life is a Must-Have thing. It could wide up our possibilities.

>>8569991
That's the point. The formulas describe everything pretty accurately up to the event horizon. But everything beyond that is a mess and the formulas dont give useful results anymore, especially at the singularity you get infinities which obviously cant be true.

But man, black holes are fascinating. I wish i was deeper in the subject and smart enough to understand the details.