/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3950458

>speed(acceleration)

>believes sociology and psycology are soft sciences
Yes.
>doesnt realize that his beliefs, education, values and culture is completely dependent on what sociologist wrote in the early 20th century
No.

Does OP think that calling something a soft science is the same as calling it irrelevant or stupid?

We just need a way to differentiate them from physics, bio, and chem. Here's something an idiot told me last week that shows why:

>> The 2008 economic collapse shows that economic science has a lot of mistakes in it. Therefore physics must also have a lot of mistakes in it, so my stupid idea to get over 100% efficiency with magnets will work even though the laws of physics say it won't.

Is time an actual thing in the universe without humans? or is it a form of human organization like north south east west. And what about left right up down?