[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.6926360 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x500, 2wpsg2q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6926360

>>6926348
>NDT hasn't done actual science since grad school

Nope. Not unless he graduated after 2008.
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/672/1/198/

>> No.6911289 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x500, 2wpsg2q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6911289

>>6911260
>implying I'm a bio person

>implying you have to major in bio to take a few bio related courses

So you don't know anything about college?

>> No.6902989 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x500, 2wpsg2q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6902989

>>6902857
>Which is just a statement that the world is consistent with creation by god.

"A" being consistent with "B", doesn't imply "B" or "A" is true (or even sensical). Your two statements are "consistent" with creation of our universe by aliens, or magic unicorns, or super impressive vampires, or __insert fantasy here__. They are also consistent with just certain aspects of the universe being created by super-powerful time traveling cat monsters manually producing quantum mechanics to mess with with us! In fact, we can go forever with consistent explanations that are just as valid as your silly god. Consistency don't make them true, or provide a good reason to believe them.

Plus, you don't actually know that your statements are consistent with actual gods existing. We don't have observations of gods creating worlds and we don't have observations of worlds appearing without gods. No data! So we don't know the difference or what each case would look like. All you have are your blind assertions, which also assume certain aspect of god, without any justification. Gods could exist, but cannot create worlds, right? Yet, another possibility, that is just as valid as your unjustified "gods create worlds" assertion. And if you blindly assert that "all worlds must come from god", or "things can't exist without god", you are assuming what you are trying to imply, the logical fallacy of circular logic.

There are no good argument for gods or magic. None. Try as hard as you want, but all you are going to do is run into dead ends and logical fallacies. That is why they invented the term "faith", because they knew that magic worship was not logically, reasonably, or scientifically valid. Hence, they just believe off "feels" like a retarded prepubescent child.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]