/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6395212
If you chose not to take it, then you don't even know the questions asked and how much validity they could have towards expressing a person's IQ, in whatever way said questions are interpreted. You cannot form a more valid opinion than mine in this situation due to different circumstances. There is no higher ground here.

I was tested for IQ years ago and scored a 135. According to my 139 score on this, it should be fairly accurate. However, the result could simply be made up and I coincidentally scored a similar value in both tests, yet that doesn't mean it accurately calculates a person's IQ.

A test, on the internet, with no trustworthy source whatsoever on how it was determined. It doesn't matter what IQ I personally got or not. Only idiots wouldn't be skeptical towards such a test.

Even at the end of the test, it says "Don't be fooled by the humor, this is real." Basically, a "believe us guise, this real," with little decorations around it.

I'll go and take an IQ test on Facebook now, on one of those tests anyone can create. If I score less than 160 and disregard it as false, then I am simply disregarding it because I "didn't do well." Sure, buddy.