/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11246564

That itself is not a causal explanation. That would be analogous to saying satellites work from electricity. While true, that information would not be useful in explaining satellites.

>>8401095
>How do we know the data isn't made up?
IT IS BEING ALL MADE UP!

www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

Here's a lesson from Mein Kampf. When ever someone has a valid excuse to defraud you, attempt to defraud them first and accuse them of lying first. Even if it's a baseless lie it'll create enough confusion and doubt that when it comes time to examine evidence which would defraud you, it'll be seen with the same confusion and doubt. This is the tactic they're using when they claim climate change is a hoax. I wish they'd teach propaganda resistance techniques and make Mein Kampf required reading for high school students so the general population wouldn't fall for this shit.

www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

Who's more full of shit? Climate change deniers or climate change alarmists?
I keep hearing climate change alarmists are lying because there's money in alternative energies. But which side is really more corrupted by money?

>>7958612
There is a surprising amount of conflicting Data on that.
Kinda like how up till a few years ago everyone thought global warming was a conspiracy theory because of conflicting Data.

>www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

>>7958612
There is a surprising. amount of conflicting data on that matter.

Kinda like how up until a few years ago everyone believed global warming was a conspiracy theory because of conflicting data.
>www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

>>7586579
>And why are there always a few [scientists] who deny it?


www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

It's sad that science can be set back for years, perhaps decades for as little as $1.2 million. The Earth can be scorched and irreversibly damaged because of a single man with a loud voice. This system of peer review works well in theory when we all play by the same rules, but in practice/reality we're not. A few people have begun cheating the system.

There's no reason to divide by zero unless a variable becomes 0 (prpgramming/algebra), or you're working with concepts of infinity.

Why do you event want know?

>>7109961
www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

>When will this hoax end?
>Soon™

www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
>The documents show that Dr. Soon, in correspondence with his corporate funders, described many of his scientific papers as “deliverables” that he completed in exchange for their money.
>Dr. Soon also received at least $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. (Mr. Koch’s fortune derives partly from oil refining.) However, other companies and industry groups that once supported Dr. Soon, including Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute, appear to have eliminated their grants to him in recent years.
>allegedly accepted $1.2 million over the past 14 years from energy companies

It's sad that science can be set back for years, perhaps decades for as little as $1.2 million. The Earth can be scorched and irreversibly damaged because of a single man with a loud voice. This system of peer review works well in theory when we all play by the same rules, but in practice/reality we're not. A few people have begun cheating the system.