/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9975060
>let's pretend there isn't any evidence so I can claim not to be dismissing any
also I'm >>9975048 not >>9974951
but the Wikipedia article does cite its sources, and just because I'm feeling sorry for you, here is a good review on the topic:
>https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/2694079/van_Horik_Emery2011.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1535927563&Signature=E%2FCFlya%2BvwrHZs0mU66yQrdH3GI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DEvolution_of_Cognition.pdf

>>9975064
If you concede that differential progeny survival based on parent cognitive ability is in fact a factor in human evolution, you admit that the study you cited isn't representative of pre-civilizational human population genetics. thank you.

also, nothing about the study's actual conclusions disagreeing with your claims?