/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3434801
Please.
You have no idea how the real world works. If you're so cynical of other people you should hope that you're a psychopath. Otherwise, you will go nowhere. Have fun never making any significant scientific progress because you can't play well with others. Eventually you have to learn to trust and work with other people, even the callous ones.

>>2073800
>>2073800
THIS.
Stop posting, /sci/. Just stop posting.

>>2066273
>My face when PL/SQL is the most annoyingly tedious stuff I've had to deal with

Databases as a whole are both incredible useful and incredibly boring.

Like someone said earlier, NAME THE SONG WHEN YOU POST THE LINK.

Give me a bit to install the x-box huge iTunes update and then I'll bet back to you (91 MB?! Really?!)...fuck, and now I have to restart.

At first I was like "ZOMG is someone on /sci/ talking about free-running?!" (because free-running activity diagrams have that same shift) and then I read your post.

sage

>>1806315
Oh, wait, nevermind.
Wrong Mimosa.
Shit.

>Ctrl + F: Bowling Ball
>Ctrl + F: E=C

I'm disappointed.

You idiots, this is a biology question, not a physics question.
The answer is 'A'. Energy flows through systems while the materials are recycled.

God, AP Bio was so fucking retarded...

You need an emulsifier.

Milk <span class="math">could[/spoiler] work.

>>1474719
It's an Armadillo Lizard, FOR THE LAST TIME.

...wait, this isn't /an/.... Oh, sorry /sci/, good to see you're still masturbating this argument.

Square it, moron.

<span class="math">_<{\wedge \atop \bf{ಠ }}_{_{_\bullet}} {\wedge \atop \bf{ಠ }}_>[/spoiler]

>>1417519
No, it wouldn't.

The only reason sterile male worked with screwworms is because it was just ONE species. The work required to do that for each of the specific species of mosquitoes in the US alone would be astronomical.

>>1325802
>implying that a Ph.D in anything other than a field directly attached to biology is qualified to speak on the topic

> Sean DeVoe There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

LOL I LOVE CHOCK NURRIS JOKES HE IS SO STRONG AND THE BEST

>functional eukaryotic genome replacement isn't far off
No.
Building a prokaryotic genome from scrapes (NOT SCRATCH) is not the same as coming up with functional eukaryotic genome. Not even for "protists". Not at all.

Go back to high school.

Also, This:>>1164069

You know that picture where the stick figure guy is smiling at his computer and then reaches him arm out and sweeps the whole thing off his desk, still smiling?

Like that.

hey /sci/
i've been coughing up mucous for the past 5 weeks.
i don't smoke but my parents do, they don't smoke much around me though. 17 years old btw.
could this just be a cold of some sort?