/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15631815
>If the vaccine is so much more dangerous then how come death rates are so much higher in unvaccinated populations?

Where did you even arrive at this ludicrous conclusion?
Belarus is the perfect example that runs contrary to this.
One of the lowest rates of uptake with the experimental injections ("vaccines" as they are generously called, even though they do not operate like traditional vaccines).

Less than 69% got injected with 1 dose of the Sputnik.
7,000 deaths. In a population of 9.5 million.

That hardly even qualifies as statistical error. More Americans keel over from heart attacks in 2 months than died to SARS 2.0 in Belarus.

The "Vaccine" is more dangerous, because countries that injected their populations repeatedly are seeing excess deaths now for 2+ years running substantially higher than in pre-2019 years, and that's accounting for those deaths attributed to COVID.

So basically, you're completely wrong. And anyone who took the injection who was not +85 years old, was a drooling retard that should forever be embarrassed.

>>15459781
actually, government is numba one. all they do with normies is one huge lol

>>15431062
+ ritualization (larpification). cattle must always be occupied with stupid activity. the question how to occupy cattle is the question #1 in all history of globohomo/civilization.

So what's the verdict here?
Is it psychosomatic or a real condition?

>>14588897
the real technological breakthroughs that happened in the last 3 decades are owned by private entities and not known to the public.

>>12739399
>as you can see in the news.
Good goy