/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6958225

How is that even relevent? If the concentration of O2 was a little higher back then it just means they had to pass less volume over their alveoli than they would now. It's not like lungs can't be larger proportionately in an animal that needs it.

And what does "amount" have to do with anything? You seriously don't think the entire sum of O2 in the atmosphere is going to change with every dinsaur breathing air, do you?

What is the most beautiful programming language?

Assuming that an infinite number of universes exist, creating an infinite number of universes that could sustain life long enough for that life itself to be able to simulate its own universe, does that mean that there are both an infinite number of universes that can simulate life and an infinite number that cannot?

If so, what is the probability that we are living in the universe simulation of another form of life?

Hey guys, I'm really not very smart but I'm just curious do you think Humanity will ever have like star fleets and be able to explore deep space? It seams like unless we develop nuclear technology to power vehicles it will be impossible to physically explore such great distances. Unless some other previously unknown method for travel is discovered. This makes me wonder, are humans ment to explore the universe? or are we just met to eat, sleep, and fuck on earth while its our time to shine until the next species is crowned king? Look at how long civilizations last before they crumble, How can we continue on a path of knowledge when on average the apex civilization crumbles after a few hundred to thousand years? Its really unfair, there is so much unknown in the world and it appears as though we are all left hanging with more questions than answers by the time we die. I was always curious as a small boy growing up in Mississippi if when we die everything is revealed to us, or if we become one with the universe.