/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10700414
>a mill powered by gravitational potential

Explain what gravity is and how it isn't electrical, I'll wait. No really I will wait even if it takes 300 replies and yet another archived thread of people saying "no ur wrong" without explaining why.

>steam engines
>refrigeration cycles
>ballistic technology and rocketry
>gliders
>metal forming and machining
>sheet metal working techniques
>heat treatment techniques

Which all work because we circle an electric transformer. Try doing all this when the molecules used in these processes don't have magnetism. Trying doing all this with no sun around, oh wait then you wouldn't even exist.

>>10700426
>Particles are just how we explain fundamental electrical behavior.
Right, so its bullshit and arbitrary. You're particularizing fucking electrical effects.

>I hate schools for teaching people they are little balls.
"schools" weren't the ones that came up with that psychosis, it was dumb physicists looking to simplify what they never understood to begin with. Some of them actually confuse "discharge" with "negative charge" and think that electricity flows like water down a pipe.

>>10700467
>their main argument is that the universe has a lot more electrical interaction than currently scientist think, that this interplanetary electrical action is the basis for many of the phenomena we see in the universe and they form not just because of gravity, for example the filamentary

Did you just refer to "gravity" as it's own separate modality? It's dielectric acceleration, a fucking electrical effect. This is why people "like you(me) who don't even know what they are talking about" exist, because people like you still talk about shit that has no basis in reality.

>>10464711
>It does warm itself, actually.
By proxy of cohesive motion acquired by the sun, yeah.

>Radioactive decay produces intense heat within the earth, and the rest is leftover from the collisions of planetary formation.
And none of that happens without a prime mover.

>How so? The Sun’s tidal forces are weaker than the Moon’s for Earth.
The earth revolves around the sun numbnuts.

>No, it’d persist for an infinite period of time until sucked into a black hole or it collides with something else
No. Absolutely all "motion" whatsoever would cease to exist. There is no EM, no energy other than what would coming from the nearest sun. It would go inert and then sublimate as it succumbs to the absence of force.

>The core cools 100 degrees Celsius per billion years so life could persist around hydrothermal vents well into the future.
This is only a fact if there is a sun causing the planet to orbit and revolve.

>I’m only talking about CO2 concentrations.
I'm talking about the entire planet. This is the planet we're talking about.

>That factor is accounted for.
Then what is the problem?

>Wrong. CO2 causes systems to warm due to its high ability to absorb infrared radiation. This has been known since the 1800’s.
>insulation causes warming

Insulation is insulation.

>>10464748
>if enough people believe that something is true, their behavior can make it true

>>10448523
>I'm too lazy and stupid too answer questions

Not a surprise. Same reason AOC banned the press from town hall meetings.

>>10288002
>The recording itself is a happening
no it's a recording of the happening.
>and time must apply for it to happen
No, it happens and then is recorded with the human language known as "math", which includes time. No, math is not how the universe works, it's how it's described.

>>10198929
Summary of this dickhead:
Pop sci high brain numbers man reads and misinterprets "Allegory of the Cave" and ultimately relies on ad hominem and appeal to authority when the inevitable questions "how does something come from nothing" or "how can a human define god?" are asked.

>>10045310
>>10045311
Parameters don't explain phenomena.