/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2597481

>If they say something less than correct, don't be a complete douchebag about it, either let it go or talk about why she may not be correct instead of what most "smart" guys tend to do and completely shoot down her statement without any regards to her

This is what I hate about women in academia. For all their talk about equality, and for all their talk about being intellectually able, when it comes down to rigorous discussion and debate women seem to think that men should just concede to women and not pull them up when they talk shit.

Your type of attitude is the reason most men don't take women seriously at university. It is also the reason most women do psychology or English lit over physics or philosophy. In psychology or English you can say any old bullshit and all you need to do is preface it with "but this is just my opinion".

You perfidious little sluts then have the audacity to say that physics, science and philosophy are unapproachable, and inaccessible because they are male-dominated (and hence aggressive). Protip: The problem isn't that they are male-orientated, the problem is that they are rigorous disciplines that require you to say things, and say things 'correctly' and in accordance with standard convention.

You can't preface a scientific paper with "oh but this is just my opinion, so don't criticise me please". This is not how the real world works, so stop being a fucking stupid cunt who thinks that she is above standard the conventions of rigour because she has a vagina and a bananrama greatest hits cd.

Everyone shut the fuck up.

Sage this thread

>>1954640

Pic related