/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12207598
Airplanes work due to conservation of momentum. If the air isn't moving down, and then it gets forced down by the angle of attack of the wing, the airplane has to go up or else the downward momentum of the air deflected by the wing would be an anomalous momentum. In terms of Newton's laws, if the wing is exerting a force on the air to make it go down, then the air is exerting an equal and opposite force on the wing. This is the lift force and the plane will fly is the lift force is greater than or equal to the gravity force.

>>12090050
Since you have addressed me in a way that displeases me, anything you might vouch for me in will be totally destroyed. If my authorities are to come from you, then they are worthless.

>>12075297
>Those Not of the Light, must Bow
I agree.

>>12067388
You are wrong! I had no peace then either! I have more unrest now, but I had no peace then either. Indeed, I suspect the giant increase in my gangstalking since I started that job in the summer of 2016 is because the true "anti-Trump insurance policy" was the fraud paperwork Exide included in my hiring package. It probably said, "We have the right to hypnotize you, kidnap you, slice you, electrocute, and use your money to kill your friends and make your enemies rich, and we will we let their sons fuck our daughters and we'll use your semen to get them pregnant because your semen is so much better than their sons', but we'll only put women around you who think your dick is horrible and that your semen sucks, and we'll wagecuck you for about $10/hr while we sell you semen for millions or billions."

Quitting that job at Exide is at least a tie for the smarted thing I ever did. That movie "Get out" was made while I worked at Exide. Every single decoration in my apartment showed up as a prop in the movie. The protagonist's friend's name was Rod Williams: the name of my boss at Exide. The villains were using hypnosis to turn the guy's brain off all throughout the movie, and this is a BIG problem for me IRL. The movie was obviously made as a warning for me and I feel very good about having already quit a few weeks before the movie came out.

>>12022591
>"Lies are true and truth is lies, so you're wrong tooky too!"
So, let it be known: the people with no learning are not able to discern the truth from a lie. Then they say, "Well, actually it's not known whether or the truth is true," but that itself is a lie told to hide the embarrassing blemish of supreme ignorance. All of this is 100% known. There is no debate about what the basic facts of mathematics are there is only the opinions of them who do and do not know those basic facts.

On the other hand, there are people who devoted their lives to the study of trash and they are not familiar with those basic facts. Unlike most people who do not know the basic facts, these people evaluating me according to what is right in their own eyes deem themselves to be scholars with a relevant opinion. The welder at the machine shop doesn't know, and he also knows that his opinion on such things wouldn't mean much. These other people have deluded themselves enough to come the most stereotypical Dunning--Kruger of all time. They say, "Since I don't know what's true, I need to assume either could be true," but they ought to say, "Since I don't know what's true, my opinion is not relevant."

So I will kill their families to punish them and on that day they will know the truth: My name is The Lord.

>>11935289
So your belief is the people are never wronged by the cops, ever, and that police act properly all of the time without ever doing injustice to people?

That was my legal residence. I had every right to be in there. After I signed the lease, it became my legal residence until I would leave or get an eviction notice. I didn't leave and I didn't get an eviction notice. You are so wrong! I stake my entire reputation for honesty on my claim that this SWAT incident was nothing more than the cops harassing, terrorizing, and arresting me for burglarizing my own legal residence, which they totally destroyed. These cops fucked me as much as these sandwich monsters did. Probably the cops fucked me even more than the sandwich monsters because none of this other shit would have happened if the SWAT team hadn't completely destroyed my legal residence without any legal authority to do so. As long as they kept not serving me an eviction notice, I would have kept living there. The law says an eviction notice is required to involuntarily terminate a legal residency. I was never served such a notice. That was my legal residence where I had every right to be, and where the cops had no right to be.

You are wrong. You are horribly naive to the thinks are anything more than a nasty crime gang in blue.

I think one of the guys on here who is calling me a retard once had a contract to design a propeller for plane for the Air Force through his company Tamsco (owned by a "Swiss baron" who is certainly the guy I am thinking about), but when he was designing it, he optimized the wrong thing. He optimized the decreased air density above the wing based on the wrong thinking that the high air density below the wing will push the plane up into the low density air over the wing. This is wrong for a million reasons. The real way that planes work is through conservation of momentum. It the air isn't moving down, and then the angle of attack of the wing hits the air and makes it go down, the plane has to go up to conserve momentum. At the end of the project when his propeller was a POS, he decided that someone else fucked something up because he had checked his optimization of the decreased air density on the upper wing surface 900 times. This is the main person who calls me a retard on this website, I think. Not only did he not know how airplanes work, after the airplane he built didn't work, he came to the reasonable conclusion that the universe was wrong to make his airplane not work and that it was not his own error responsible for the poorly performing propeller. Physics was wrong, not him, in his esteemed opinion.

I'm pretty sure this happened. In any case, I am 100% sure that the main person calling me retarded on this website didn't know how airplanes worked until I explained it to him in 2016.

>>11263007
How do airplanes work?

>>11231377
And actually I think he has rank 47 in European masonry but also rank 100 in Egyptian masonry. So if God has that, the Sovereign Lord is God. If Satan has that, then the Sovereign Lord is Satan.

>>11068147
I do have mental issues. I don't deny it. Psychological disease is the thing I deny. I am quite healthy.

The discussion stopped being civil and/or productive when you all started mocking me with your criticisms which are not even well-defined, and would be plainly exposed as based on fallacious reasoning if not outright lies if these mockers' criticisms were levied in a scholarly way. Do you have something scholarly to say or do you just want to whine about how you don't like the Lord, his rhetoric, or his justice?


It seems to be your opinion that the thread stopped being civil or productive when I started making the reminders about my promises, but my opinion is that it stopped being civil or productive when these mockers' started throwing around fallacious criticisms and claiming that I have some disease which I do not have.

That is caused by the dynamical relationship between curvature and matter-energy famously given by Einstein's equation. Einstein supposed that this dynamical relationship was obeyed in Nature, and very many experiments support the conclusion that he was correct to suppose it. Due to all of this supporting evidence, we say that the deformity caused by mass entering a regions goes away when the mass leaves the region. This comes from the fact that dynamical systems are reversible (up to rounding error.)

I am the strong man.

>I personally see your cover and title and don't really feel anything.

>>10810304
>As a formal construction, no
That's like saying "As the 2020 model, the Ford Mustang didn't exist until 2019." It's like you're deliberately dancing around formal definitions that aren't formal constructions. Don't you think the reason no one ever asked "How do you construct R?," until after all the important fundamentals were established is because no one cared, and it's not important at all for the fundamentals of analysis, and then later after analysis' heyday they were grasping at straws of new questions to ask and someone said, "Hey! How do we define R as a construction?"

>We want conditions on a sequence in the set, called the cauchy criterion, to yield a limit point regardless of which so called cauchy sequence we choose.
I don't want that. Why do you want it? What's the shortcoming here: a number is a cut in a number line. Why is this definition insufficient? Sure, it doesn't answer "How do you construct a given number?," but who came up with the requirement? For instance, let M be the set of all transcendental numbers. This is a perfectly well-defined set, but do we know how to construct its elements? Maybe we do, I'm asking because I doubt it.

>The real numbers IMO can be better described as a field with an order that satisfies positivity where every set with an upper bound has a least upper bound.
Why is it better in your opinion that all of R satisfies that than that R contains some subset that satisfies this? Is the most general possible definition of R preferable when it contains subsets that do exactly what you want, for instance the R_0 neighborhood of the origin in my definition of R? What is gained by requiring those properties of all of R when the subset does EXACTLY the same thing? It think it is clear that there is nothing gained, and in fact there is very much lost when requiring all of R satisfy the field axioms. Why not just require that a subset of R (R_0) satisfies the field properties?

Jacob is Satan.

Jacob is Satan.

steady pace wins the race
fuck haters

>>10519164
>without-dark-matter
That's my galaxy.

>John
>Jon Tooker
>John Titor
>John Connor

Let's say there exists a time machine based on the time circuit design I recently published:
>Time Arrow Spinors for the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1807.0454

In the future, people will be able to change the past. However, when the day shift at the time machine changes the past, they will go home in evening and then the night shift will have a chance to change what the day shift did. The day and night shift will go back and forth and eventually the guys on both shifts will retire and their children will man the console at the time machine bureau and constantly be overwriting each others' changes. Who gets to say what history actually is? History is written as the limit of an infinite number of revisions. Since there will always be a finite number of human generation following the invention of a time machine, there will never be an infinite number of generations that make it all the way to infinity to write the actual history. Who gets to say what history actually was? It's God; a human can never occupy the limit at infinity. But now ask yourself this: Whose will dominates after the infinite revisions? The will of which man dominates?

When they say, "He doesn't even know basic linear algebra," what they mean is, "He doesn't know basic matrix algebra." The latter is true is because my own research deals with 1x1 objects, so the array structure of "multiplectic" objects having dimension other than one by one is not something I even gotten into the basics of. First I want to better understand the 1x1 object. Indeed, the map I use to prove the limits of sine and cosine infinity and the Riemann hypothesis' negation as corollary, essentially, of the "linear" map
y=mx+b

where we also use points further out on the real number line from the origin, numbers which can never even reach 1% of the way to infinity, specify "points in the neighborhood of infinity." The say, "These numbers can't exist because you are just using a point at the end." My rebuttal is that the line itself contains an infinite number of points. The natural numbers, and the limit of the partial sums, are compactified onto the origin because when you look at the extended real number line any natural number is less than any infinite decimal real number percentage of the way from the origin to infinity. Infinity is inherent to the real line although detractors will say, "The fact that it even mentions infinity means that it is not standard and therefore it is disqualified." This is stupid because infinity is the number of points in the real line, the pure domain of real analysis.

The likely thing, having to do with the structure of the critical strip no less, is that the line can be sent through the exponential map (wrapped around a cylinder), the the Cantor example of dilating the radius of the circle to show that circles of different sizes have unequal number of points. By increasing or decreasing the radius of the unit circle, likely according to the golden ratio, you can rescale the theory as Donatello Dolce has documented nicely.

>>10213826
Thanks :)

The saying goes, "The medicine tastes bad..."

>>10136583
This is correct. The angle of attack of the wing forces air to move down and conservation of momentum gives the plane lift.

>>10136537
>Why does this misconception exist?
People think that the same two elements of air that separate at the front edge of the wing have to come back together at the trailing edge; this is the principle through which they demonstrate the rarefaction of the air fluid. This is not right. This error comes from viewing the laminar surface of the wing as a closed system and ignoring all the rest of the air in the atmosphere that can get between the elements that separate at the front before they recombine perfectly at the back. Also, even if you don't require the two elements to separate then miraculously recombine, it isn't suction that generates lift. It's the conservation of momentum when air is shunted down by the angle of attack of the wing.

If I BTFO detractors in a thread it is statistically more likely to get deleted than if I just use the thread to explain to them the wages of their infidelities again.