/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10447304
Tell me: is ordering parts from a catalog and copy-pasting spreadsheets in Excel for 60 hours a week "real" engineering? Because once you grow up and leave college, you will realize that is all that 90% of "real" engineers do for their job. FFS, you college freshmen are so insufferable and have no business being engineers.

t. "real" engineer

>>10413005

>>9276940
The thing with gender, is that it doesn't exist.

People are looking for patterns, and then giving it a label when people deviate from those patterns.

That, by itself is no issue, but problems arise when people attach value to it. Then expect other people to value their categorization the same way they do.

Most people won't care if you, for example, are a man and have long hair and are romantically passive.
The further someone strays from the pattern, the more traditionalists are bothered, for example a man wearing a dress.
People love patterns so this isn't too surprising.

Probably the biggest thing though, the things which has caused the most drama between the traditionalists and the people propagating the gender revolution, is that they take words and change what they mean. Which (((destroys public dialogue))) and just creates more public division.
For example, gender just used to men man or woman, but now it is not a synonym for sex, it is about personality traits and preferences. They take boy/girl which used to mean male/female and not it too is about personality and preferences.

Other issues which results from the gender revolution but I am too busy to go into detail on.
People are making their entire identities about gender. People with no substance are using a label and then using it to get as much attention as possible.
People are changing genders because they just want to be measured against the standards of the opposite sex.