/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4260890
>philosophy douchery in a math thread

>>4177866

>>4152780
>>>4152777
>nice quads

gtfo my /sci/

>>3954588
>I never watched the original Star Trek

ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ

gtfo my /sci/

>>3322507
Your post suggests that you are addressing me and not
>>3322437

So, I'll spell it out for you. First, I use cat pics to differentiate my posts from others when I want to make an exchange.
Second, You are among a group who gives a fuck about the proper term. Use it.

You can toss out rhetoric all day long on the intentions of people using the proper terms but that is your perception and not actual reality.
In reality, those terms were created (mostly by doctors) to differentiate stages of development.

What you are up to is causing confusion in order to lead people into an equivocation fallacy.

Again, are you arguing that a cellular life form with the potential to be a fully formed human should hold the same rights as a fully formed human or not?
Whichever side you are on, that is the subject.
Both have very good reasons for choosing their position, which is why this is an ongoing debate.
You will get no where by trying to color the language in your favor.
Even if you succeed, educated people will see it for the farce it is and still argue against you.

>>2884460
If you won't go through the material, don't expect anyone on here to take you seriously.

You stand on a mountain of ignorance and call us the fools.
We have nothing more to talk about. Go back to /b/

Since when is the universe flat?

Did we also prove god?

>>>/an/

>>2299762
>lbs in. and feet
>measuring systems that are ergonomically designed for humans
>ergonomically designed
>ergonomically designed
>ergonomically designed
>ergonomically designed
>non science type things
>non science type things
>non science type things
>non science type things

>>2178587
>1291930835974.jpg

>lumping feynman in with the rest of those faggots

Get this bullshit off /sci/. If you want a no-rules, what-vehicle-goes-around-a-track fastest race, the optimal solution will look NOTHING like a car as you know it.

No rules means no rules. All that's happening here is a shitload of uneducated bickering and fantasizing about normal car designs by people who think they know better than ACTUAL racecar designers.

>>1738752
6/10

>>1115649

>>1040136
>I take issue with Sagan. Although my hero, he's not a scientist.
He's your hero, but you're not even aware of his scientific work? He wasn't just a science popularizer..