/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15247082
>>15247084
I should mention there is a clear potential motive. And in particular the central role it plaus today. In my conversations with people, it has become self-evident for me that in many respects liberalism (and it's corollaries) serves as the equivalent of a religion in the past. This event -- WW2, and in particular the Holocaust -- serves as a political, ideological, and moral south pole; whatever Hitler and the Germans advocated is the ultimate evil (eugenics, epistrocracy/aristorcracy, anti-liberlism, ethno-nationalism, JQ etc.), opposing them is the ultimate good (anti-"racism", democracy, egalitarianism, democracy, open borders, internationalism). What was Trump called by opponents? Nazi (I don't like Trump btw). Or indeed any somewhat right-wing person who opposes certain dogmas. What is essentially a curse word in modern moral and political discourse? Fascist, nazi etc..
I am not saying that this was the motivation; war atrocity propaganda is common, in this case, the Germans suffered a [math]\textit{total defeat}[/math] fighting the 3 global empires, despite BTFOing them on a per-man basis (i.e. kd ratio), made all the more impressive with their relative lack of resources. It is worth noting that Germany [math] \textbf{never officially or legally surrendered} [/math], and fought until the very end. It is also not a conspiracy to say that the Jews held massively inordinate in influence in the press, media, and other narrative-forming institutions (e.g. academia, finance, Hollywood etc.)), but it has in many ways served this purpose. And now has replaced Christianity -- in my estimation -- as the state religion. Indeed, denial is considered blasphemy and is literally illegal in most of the West. What other historical event is backed by the use of force?