/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5108450
Except it isn't.

>>4607185

but this is the sort of graph a real scientist would look at.

this is only some of the bullshit the enviormental scientists are trying to convey. theres also the "depletion of ozone", which is infact a reversible reaction which aslo creates ozone.

Man is truly arrogant if they are to belive that they can have such a great impact on nature. in our current standing nature holds far more power than that of man.

hey /sci i have a q about global warming. According to this graph, co2 levels happen like this periodically and drop down after. I also hear commonly that only 3% of co2 is from humans. what is the scientific argument that human produced co2 is causing warming?

But to suggest that there is anything we can do to stop it is like me saying I will warm up Lake Kariba by pissing over Victoria Falls.

Mankind's efforts would be better expended in planning for the ice age to come. If you are in any doubt about that prediction have a look at this and you will see a cycle that has repeated for over 400,000 years and is about to plunge the temperature of this planet once more.