/sci/ - Science & Math

Anonymous Thu May 25 20:47:04 2017 No.8935782 [View]
File: 53 KB, 600x401, Predicted versus Actual U.S. Primary Energy Use 1975 to 2005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>8935447
>We should expect at least 30 TW in the near future, and possibly as high as 70 TW.

These predictions never come true.

Anonymous Sun Dec 21 12:26:25 2014 No.6962977 [View]
File: 53 KB, 600x401, Predicted versus Actual U.S. Primary Energy Use 1975 to 2005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6961058

Because as it turns out, there's lots of uranium around and we don't need to generate that much power to begin with.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

Navigation
View posts	[+24]	[+48]	[+96]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search: