/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14642638
pussy, if you oblige
vajayjay, if you will
coochie, if you insist
snatch, perhaps

>>11458132
>the observer effect
lol

>>11458293
>muzzies
theres no such thing. only arabs and then whatever else those brown asains with islam are

>>9766536
>he is actually trying to imply there isn't a historical or contemporary precedent for conspiracy
>implying powerful people don't conspire

What's it like having a double-digit IQ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_(geology)

>topologists masturbating in this thread

>>8571360
so there's a 9.33x10^157 / 10000 chance that they'll be evenly distributed

>>7595589
Prove it's pseudo intellectual

>>7362167
Hairy Ball Theorem (google it it's a thing) + Gravity Waves, both

>>7357167
>I'd accept condensation if it was coming from someone someone who was even mildly successful in his field

>Not accepting condensation from only top-tier scientists

You're just diluting yourself if you think otherwise

>>7270090
>maize was only a tiny grain

dude, at least look into your claims first

the Maya and Aztecs had huge amounts of maize and grew it on their damn rooftops with their own formulation of fertilized soil.

Native Americans knew how to domesticate things. They also had extensive contact with each other, despite what Diamond says.

Cahokia itself is a treasure trove of evidence for how extensive trade and cultural exchange definitely happened in the Americas.

I'm sorry that Diamond can get btfo in one image.

asl

>>7201623
>Biodiversity is less of a problem than people make it out to be

You are one funny guy

bump

>>6532768
Try graphing f(x) = sqrt(1 - x^2).

Suddenly, you can integrate circles on a Cartesian plane.

>>6438404
>mfw I've probably published more and been more successful as a grad student than the person who made this will ever be

Hello /sci/ how does it feel being red headed stepchild under the staircase of 4chan

So, applying the individual to QM
>inb4 stopped reading there
When you see a picture on a message board, and you have never seen that picture at all, is that the first time that picture has been existing outside itself? The conundrum being that you as an 'outside' can not say that you're able to be with another 'outside' and thus undermine the problem.

Can this not be overcome in the smallest of steps?

>>5653606
If 0.999.. = 1 then couldnt you say that all number represent themselves in the infinitive negative? And what implications does he think that will have on how we could determine them

Bumping softly before I crash.