/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8093541
>LITERALLY
OP, I would normally give you 10 points off due to superfluous use of "literally", but given the ALL CAPS presentation, I'm going to deduct 20.

>>8007732
>>meat needs non meat products to taste good
That's not even close to what I said.


Meanwhile, broccoli, carrots, etc all taste better with salt too.

>murdering and suffering of sentient pigs
A friend of mine was murdered. I think it's really insensitive of you to imply that what happened to her is comparable to what happens to a box of chicken mcnuggets, douchebag.

>murdering and suffering of sentient pigs
Most slaughtered animals don't suffer, cock-gobbler.

>murdering and suffering of sentient pigs
Pigs aren't sentient. See the thread about the "mirror test".

>>anybody who doesn't make the same choices I do has a learning disability
>yes this is actually exactly what I am saying. What an asshole.

>most people are not intelligent.
There's nothing about "murdering" pigs that even implies that meat eaters are dumb.

>>8001738
>Dude, whatever, if you don't want to discuss just leave the thread. holy shit.
Not him, but you can go fuck yourself.
We all want a better online community, and you're shitting up the place.
Oh and for the record, the whole "quantum immortality" thing is a bullshit thought experiment, not a practical form of immortality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_suicide_and_immortality
>Tegmark explains, however, that life and death situations do not normally hinge upon a sequence of binary quantum events like those in the thought experiment.[6]

Hell, even at their best QM "interpretations" aren't science, they're a vain effort to take what we've observed about how the universe actually works and reconcile that with a childish emotional need to believe that the universe shouldn't contain unanswerable questions.

>>7983678
>None of those studys can be confirmed by you or I.
Did you even check out the links Opie?
The Cavendish experiment was done in 1797 with a homemade apparatus.
Most Anons from DIY could reproduce this experiment.
Besides, are you insinuating there's some giant, centuries-long conspiracy to hide the truth?

>>7913023
>Even if we can go light speed or slightly faster. The galaxy is so huge.
THIS
It's anywhere from 100 billion to 500 billion stars, depending on which estimate you trust.
Never mind travel time.
Lets say we build a thousand starships.
For reference, all the world's navies COMBINED don't have a thousand ships (not counting smaller boats).
Let's also assume we can send our thousand starships so fast they can explore two star-systems a week.
That's a millions star-systems every ten years.
It would still take 1-5 MILLION years to explore the galaxy.