/sci/ - Science & Math

>When will it be created?
Far sooner than you would expect. There will be hiccups as humans attempt to implement true emotion, however progress arrives as they realize that only a replication of a real emotional system is needed to produce the same effects.
>Is it worth creating?
Most certainly. Humankind will soon discover what technological leaps AI computers can and will bring.
>What will it do?
Take knowledge to a level beyond what humans are capable of understanding.

>>3196681
>6% calculate illusionary statistics about anonymous identities

>>3160220
>>3160216
great, now prove that killing hitler would stop the murder of Jews and you have me convinced.

>>3088975
You're obviously a biologist who has studied this matter extensively.

>>3080659
No, all trip fags are identical in consistency.

>>3074985
>bbabby's 100th nternet IQ test.

>>3064397
how would you populate your database (given everything is true) ?

>>2985322
>mfw wind power causes global warming

>>2969709
you mean the 4.2 lightyears to the nearest star?

Remind me againt what the distance between europe and america was and how that's a valid analogy?

>>2954848
Okay fuck the turning test. When/how do we get something like Hal 9000?

>>2950629
I can't let you do that dave.

>>2644081
If the limiting factor of how far we can develop is when you have to spend your whole life learning what you need to invent new shit, then that is solved by developing an artificial intelligence. It only needs to spend a small part of its life learning what it needs, and then for the rest of its life it can research new stuff. AI has unlimited lifespan because failing components can just be replaced or upgraded.

In accordance with everything else in this board,

is Hal equal to, under or over 9000?