/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6542868
>gb2 lesswrong Elizer
Eliezer posting on 4chan? Pic related.

>>5948590
Please relate pi and sqrt(2).

>>5915336
>http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/20/4542244/cosmos-a-spacetime-odyssey-trailer

sage

Holy shit.
Is this the same dude from /b/ like 8 hours ago?

hey bros, i really need some math help and have no idea in understanding it.

This is the problem... (2x+5) (x+6)

I need to find the "product" and "sum"

How would I find the product and sum?

>>4280295

>>3775855

>CAPTCHA: DRAMA houleye

How does a radio work?

>Aliens make first contact with Christians.

Implying the universe spontaneously combusted would require one to admit that before the universe, time, and even all the laws that govern reality existed, that their "concept" would have been required to have been created.

How is it that the "laws" of physics are able to "be" and are able to exist to begin with? Where did time, the concept of reality, and nothingness itself come from?

Stephen Hawkings is just a sad man who will only search for and provide theories that would disprove God because of his disability issues, given that in his situation, it would easily be hard to believe. He would not go out of his set mindset to at least attempt to test his on beliefs by testing this opposite.

>>3529535

If I had a penny every time some religious atheist shouted those words, I would no longer need to work.

>>3429590

>>3424902

>In Genesis 1:6-8, we are told that one of God's first creations was a firmament in the heavens. This likely refers to the creation of the luminiferous aether. The luminiferous aether was supposedly debunked in the Michelson-Morley experiment, but this is clearly further evidence of the liberal bias of the scientific method.

Oh lawd! Is you serious, conservapedia?

>>3346957

>>3241950

This is probably it. Since traveling that fast wouldn't allow you to see anything. But nothing can't look like something so you would probably just arrive. Come to think of it, that entire question is strange. Maybe if it was a "short" distance it would be practically instant, but think if it was a extremely long distance? What WOULD one see? The travel can't be instant just because of the laws of physics. OP, you have altered physics to your liking and your question doesn't work.

I think

>see autoplay=1, loop=1
>mfw

>mfw may 21st.

>mfw when I read the question

inb4 200 posts from armchair physicists

>>2494116
Yeah I already assumed I'd have to take some weed out classes.