/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10779344
If you can show that I am wrong then I will freely admit it as I have many, many, many times. That doesn't uspet my worldview at all, if you can show that I'm wrong about something then that means someone with a brain is reading my posts and that's exactly what I want to happen. However, when you guys say, "By the axiom that you are wrong, you are wrong," that makes me want to kill you. It upsets my worldview when you are mostly a bunch of pathetic trolling retards.

I like it when you show me that I am wrong. That's how I can get back to the drawing board to fix things. It is much harder to find your own errors that to have a collaborator have a glance, and it is mostly some sorry set of collaborators that I have. In fact, I suspect one of the main reasons I have been so effectively segregated from the other intelligent, educated people, is because they know letting me collaborate in the usual way will yield fantastic results that they cannot shit on.

>I am 100% sure you've made an elementary error.
I am also 100% sure of this. I am 100% sure there are multiple elementary errors all throughout my 30 papers. My conjecture is that none of these errors are unfixable and all of my main results are exactly correct. For instance, I said the Euler product zeros disproved RH, but then I read Riemann's paper and I saw he was quite explicit about the requirement for absolute convergence. However, I fixed it and my result that zeta has zeros there is still the same.

>>10776578
A delusion is an easily disproven belief, you imbecile. Helene is evil. Not only that, she is a woman who is evil.