/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8629698
>>8629085
>>8628683 (OP)
>Who ever made this graph flunked statistics class. The y axis are measurements in standard deviations.

And there's a reason why Arctic Ice graphs start at 1979. They cherry picked a date of unusually high ice levels. Look at pic from an early UN IPCC report; they were more honest back then.

>>7621505
By pure coincidence, 1979 was a year that had very high arctic sea ice. Pic related. Thanks for the cherry-picking!

>>7526282
>Reality
>NOAA

Cutting of satellite data of Arctic ice at 1979 (highest spot) when it goes back to the 1972 dip.

>>7479199
Almost all graphs of Arctic ice start in 1979 where, sea ice was at a very high level. This cherry-picking distorts the results. Satellite data goes back to 1973 when the ice was much lower.

>>7134746
>When that was disproved,

Where? In your fantasy world?
Reality says otherwise.
>>7131020
>>7131027
>>7131668
>>7132848
>>7132994

Notice how they always start modern arctic ice graphs at about 1979. Why is that? Satellite data goes back to 1973. And there's a huge ice loss in 1973. But a huge peak at about 1979. Gosh its almost as if they're cherry picking...