/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15607937
>Is there any evidence to support the claim that the Covid shot causes blood clots?

Wrong question.
Is there any evidence that vaccination has an positive impact on longeivity and all over health?

Vaccination has only benefit:
>Vaccination records are used to exclude a certain diagnosis label when a disease pattern occurs

If person is vaxxed the self fulfilling prophecy and Bias is used to exclude "covid", when a person has the same exact disease pattern as covid.
They simply then will skip covid in differntial diagnosis and say:
>its RSV or Flu or Mycoplasmosis or the Cold

As soon as the vaccine was deployed to 70% of the population they remembered everyone to suspect a different disease.
Before everything was covid.

All over morbidity and disease patterns are ignored.

Looking at adverse events does not matter.
All that matters is:
>does the vaccine have any benefit?
If the same amount of people get sick or die or even more, there is no benefit.

If the vaccine gets a damage control PR with "it protects from the coof but males suceptible to Flu, RSV etc." You are getting played

>>15538739
Whopping cough is not a specific disease.
it is coughing.
It is not caused by bordetella pertussis.
Maybe just maybe there is a bazillion reasons, why a fucking human being gets sick.

And there is also no real distinction between a infant brochitis and "pertussis" except doctors looking at "vaccination status".

[math]
\begin{equation}
\text{Child has rash}=\begin{cases}
Measels , & \text{child is not or incompletly vaxxed}.
\\
\\
Erythema+Fever , & \text{if child is vaxxed}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
[/math]

It's a game of guesstimation.
Also lets look into vaccine side effects from literally all vaccines for children:
Post marketing experience of adverse events of vaccines:
https://www.fda.gov/media/75157/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/163009/download
"6.2 Postmarketing Experience :
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders
Apnea, cough. "

Cough/runny nose

And of course the Hepatitis B vaccine for infants:
https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines%2C%20blood%20%26%20biologics/published/package-insert-recombivax-hb.pdf

"Hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, bronchospasm, and urticaria
have been reported within the first few hours after vaccination. "

Your belief is: That doctors can and will and do perfectly and acuratelly diagnose a specific disease.
And the issue is and that appaerently nobody cares about: "is the child healthier"
All the medical system carses about "is a label for a collection of symptons less frequently used"
Which is retarded, because the label for "cough and fever" and be multiple and they diagnose only what is favourable.
And all methods of diagnositics which are attempting to establish, that only ONE specific type of organism is CAUSAL for a specific collection of symptoms, are not based on science, because there is not a single experiment nor study which proves or remotely shows that Dry cough of an infant is caused by a specific organism.
It is all memes.
>picrel

>>15421822
widespread epidemics.
are literally a meme.
It's a broadcast phenomeon.
If you force test and create fear, and claim that different diseases and symptoms all of a sudden are all now ony disease, then you can declare a "pandemic".

>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epidemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

What is the actual disease?
That is the way more important question.
A so called "pathognomonic" symptom, is one which has a certain "hallmark" so you can identify a disease and differenciate it from every other disease.
Whats the hallmark of the flu, covid, rsv, the cold?
>picrel

>>15417562
>infection rate
How is infection rate established?
By epidiological statistical counting of declared diagnosis.
If docters ar told:
Diagnose [cluster of symptoms] as disease x then it will be counted as such, no matter how accurate the diagnosis.
See:
>>15417475
>>15403826

If they then change the definition of the diagnosis or splitt them apart because
>the science changed
The statistics will of course change.

Doctors are literally indoctrinated and follow peer pressure and declarations of the medical boards of oversight.

>widespread epidemics.
are literally a meme.
It's a broadcast phenomeon.
If you force test and create fear, and claim that different diseases and symptoms all of a sudden are all now ony disease, then you can declare a "pandemic".

>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epkdemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

Epidemics are started and ended with the strike of a pen.
>picrel

>>15362255
>immunologist
i-meme-ologist

This shitty compartmentalization of the Medical system dumb as fuck.
A imemeogologist, does nothing but "interpreting" cell culture damage, which is passed over from viroliegists.
So the V-Tards pretend to do an "isolation", by poisoning and staining cell cultures.
Then they pass their results on to I-Tards, which literally just believe the crap.
And if you ask them, how do they know what they recieve is the specific virus which causes the specific disease, they say: "I am a immunologist, it's not my job, I just believe the virologists".
They the process a "sample" of the virus, which is nothing but:
>dead cell debris soaked in amphotericin B and Penecilin and Gentamycin
>contaminated with embryonic bovine serum

Then they take this shit, and add it to a new cell culture, maybe add white blood cells and on the premise, that the shit, they received is a "virus", they interpret a immune response.

Immunology is a tautology of virology.

>if finding B is dependent on the finding of A
>and finding A is wrong then B is also wrong

But this retarded chain of tautology is spilled into the Medical Doctors.
>MDs make diagnosis based on the claim of immonologists and they make claims based on memes created by Virologists
>it's all memes

>>15325133
memes
It's all memes.

"""Flu"""
Is the same retarded shit as coof.
Neither flu nor Covid have any pathognomonic symptom to differenciate between each other.

Alone the spectrum of "symtoms" of which only some has to be there.
It's memes...
All is memes.

Absolute memes.

>>15298802
>flu

Whatever you believe the "flu" is...

Starvtion, war, literally giving people mercury and arsenic as "prophylactic" medicine.
Back then every collection of unspecific symptoms was categorised as "syphillis" or "typhus" or Tuberculosis and influenza was later on populaized.
>widespread epidemics.
are literally a meme.
It's a broadcast phenomeon.
If you force test and create fear, and claim that different diseases and symptoms all of a sudden are all now ony disease, then you can declare a "pandemic".

>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epkdemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

Epidemics are started and ended with the strike of a pen.
>picrel

>>15293966
>widespread epidemics.
are literally a meme.
It's a broadcast phenomeon.
If you force test and create fear, and claim that different diseases and symptoms all of a sudden are all now ony disease, then you can declare a "pandemic".

>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epkdemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

Diseases are started and ended with the strike of a pen.
>picrel

>>15271809
dude. they do the following for thousands of yeas:
>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epkdemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

Diseases are started and ended with the strike of a pen.
Always were.
They did this exact same shit with:
>leprosy
>pestilence
>syphillis
>polio
>AIDS
>Covid

Collect symptoms, declare all symptoms are now one disease. And then split them apart when feasable.
Doctors cannot even distinguish between: Rubella, Measels, Scarlet fever, Mumps, Erythema multiforme and other skin rashes.
They simply cannot find a "pathognomonic" exact symptom, they pretend to know.
But only run with "exclusion criteria".
[math]
\begin{equation}
\text{Child has rash}=\begin{cases}
Measels , & \text{child is not or incompletly vaxxed}.
\\
\\
Erythema+Fever , & \text{if child is vaxxed}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
[/math]

you can create a pandemic everytime whenever you like, you just have to claim:
>all these symptoms are sign of [insert new disease]
Picrel

>>15240428
>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epkdemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

Diseases are started and ended with the strike of a pen.
Always were.

>>15218394
>Virologists did in fact say that a novel coronavirus was bound to affect us in the future after MERs.

>1) collect a group of symptoms from various or similar diseases (or ICD-10 codes)
>2) declare the group of collected symptoms now are a new Disease
>3) deploy a scare campaign and panic and make sure that [insert new disease] is diagnose as often as possible, so that people with one or more symptoms can be declared as "infected"
>4) include a asymptomatic form of disease, and make sure it gets diagnosed
>5) declare pandemic based on epidemiological/ statistical increase of diagnosis [insert new Disease or ICD-10 code]
>6) use pandemic to increase regulatory power, thin out population and force product on them
>7) after product is deployed revise what you told on step 2) and say symptoms are now different diseases and should be diagnosed as such
>8) declare pandemic is over based on epidemiolical/statistical decrease of diagnosis with [insert new disease or ICD-10 Code]

they do this trick every time.
Starting with leprosy, then pestilence, then syphylis, then malaria, then polio, then aids, then swine flu, then covid.

None of these "pandemic" or "epidemics" are cause by an disease with pathognomonic symptoms.
Hell... they cannot even distinguish:
> measels, pocks, shingles, rubella
They just see a skin disease.
Then do a round of thinking
> "must be the rubella"
> "But my child is vaccinated against it"
> "oh then it cannot be rubella... it must be scarlet fever with erythema multiforme"
They just pretend to know that the symptoms are a specific disease, but in fact, they go with whats "trending" or look at the vaccination data, and then exclude the other diseases, with the exact same group of symptoms and then they assign a new "ICD-10" diagnosis to the patient.

Most diseases have "flu like symptoms".
Sometimes with a) skin condition or b) neurological condition c) diarrhea
There are almost no pathognomonic diseases. It's wizardry.

>>15186633
>people who think COVID is a hoax.
it's not a hoax. It is a meme.

>>15152841
>But the definition is roughly:
>"An acute contagious viral infection of humans, characterized by inflammation of the respiratory tract and by fever, chills, muscular pain, and prostration."
Is literally what happens with all "flu/cold"-like diseases.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/13/well/covid-flu-rsv-symptoms.html
> picrel

>Of which the most importamt aspect, as compared to the poisons you mention is the contagiousness of it.
Contagiousness is a claim and a reification fallacy, when the fact of transmissibility is never proven to begin with.

When do most flu cases happen ?
> between December and March
Why?
> because
> its cold
> people eating candy, and jumping from one holiday binge drinking to the next
> sugar
> alcohol
> sugar
> alcohol and eating fatty crap all day long
Oh all people are sick in a vaguely similar time, who were part on similar events.
All so drunk and binge eating and drinking.


>Well don't take a genious to infer something out of that.
You don't have to be a "declared" genius, to just stop believing in things that were never proven.