/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10823255
see
>>10823020

Industry 'research' is low quality and this is intentional. Insurer behavior says it all.

>>10822261
do you think anyone who opposed 5G is a rural and suburban retard, tranny?

humans evolved to take advantage of sunlight, not microwaves. this is why microwaves kill all living things and your employers cant get insurance on their transmitters.

>>10822268
m2

>>10768651
why cant your master get insurance on his soon to collapse corporation's microwave emitters, tranny?

Hi /sci/, /g/ here.

Redpill me on 5G. I know there hasn't been enough long-term testing to say with complete definitiveness that's it's harmful or not harmful, but in your opinion, do you think it'll fuck everyone up?

>>10705514
why are swiss re and lloyds of london refusing to insure and issuing warnings to the insurance market?

>If you follow the money, this is HUGE. After all, if these wi-fi techno-toys are so safe, why is Lloyds leaving all this additional money on the table?
>Well, Lloyd’s November 2010 Risk Assessment Team’s Report gives us a solid clue: the report compares these wireless technologies with asbestos, in that the early research on asbestos was “inconclusive” and only later did it become obvious to anyone paying attention that asbestos causes cancer.