/sci/ - Science & Math

Since it's going to get brought up in my next thread anyways, I will bump with it.

>>12318737
Shitcunt, what reason do you have to think a number is a point? Have I defined points that way? Have you cited any article which gives you reason to think that a point is a number? No, on both counts. A point is a element of a geometric representation, but numbers are elements of algebraic representations. You have no reason to identify a point as an element of an algebraic representation, and the reason you have never cited any article which gave you reason to think it might be is because you know as well as I do that there is none. Your entire ruse is nothing but an attempt to invoke semantic ambiguity between the general idea of what a point is and the very specific treatment I have given to "geometric points" in the paper. You are completely retarded and your attempt to confuse "x" with "X" disgusts me.