[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12163796 [View]
File: 27 KB, 567x154, liu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12163796

Suppose you have a graded ring [math]B[/math]. Is it required that the ring is non-empty in every degree?

For example, can I assume there exists an element [math]f\in B_1[/math]?

I'm asking because I'm reading this book that does not make any assumptions on the graded ring (other than it is an algebra over a field, but I don't think it's relevant here) and he's picking some element from [math]B_1[/math] for an argument. When reading Hartshorne, I think he always used to make some extra strong assumption like the irrelevant ideal [math]B_+[/math] is generated by [math]B_1[/math] so it wasn't be ambiguous, but he also used that property for other things (like finding an open cover with certain properties)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]