/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11957497
>Your point? Doesn't change the fact that they want nothing other than LOOKS and STATUS. IQ? Kindness? Game? Worthless.
>t. incel

>>11932943
>the mask won't stop the virus because there is no airborne virus. COVID is a virus in the way that a computer virus is a virus, i.e.: not a virus at all

>>11917147
>>11917147
>Nanotech or regulating body acidity since acidity seems to cause cancer

>NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! YOU CAN’T JUST CHEAT ON MY HECKIN TEST!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbzJTTDO9f4

IQ tests are fairly meaningless, IQ as a whole doesn't have any impactful meaning on ability or intelligence, just logical thinking ability and problem solving, which is just one way that intelligence is shown.

In 2002-2003, we had the sars outbreak. In 2020, we have the coronavirus. Is it possible we could see a SARS/Coronavirus outbreak every 15-20 years?

>>11544310
>repeating numbers don't exist

Would it be better to let the coronavirus burn itself out than locking everything down and causing economic calamity?

So, does Covid-19 have the potential for levels of devastation unseen since the Spanish Flu?

>>11409113
t. insecure physics major
>doesnt understand his own field
>only see himself in everyone

The last insecure physics major I talked to believes Bell's experiment says QM violates speed of light postulate lol also he's surprised that optimizations problems have duals (which is related to his area of `research`, which is, ironically Bell's inequalities)

>>11402142

>actual quotes from top philosophers
>the opposite is true
>pop-söy

How about you Learn your philosophy you brainlet

>>11399884
>misunderstood both basic math and contemporary physics

>>11399851
>>11399874

When they write -1/12 they simply omit the asymptotic terms. Someone who actually knows what they are doing would first justify their equal sign '=' next to the series to NOT have standard meaning (which is limit of partial sum). And since they were not talking about the limit of partial sum so they can ignore the divergent asymptotic term. In physics, the competent physicists would say the divergent term is cancelled by physical constraints (e.g zero point energies). This result is then misinterpret by some of their less intelligent students.

So recently, I had a test in Calculus and before the test, I was given a review sheet, which is standard. Turns out that the questions on the review are literally carbon copies of the questions on the test. This isn't a first time thing, either. I remember review sheets in high school being word for word copies of the final exam. No wonder so many dumbfucks crack through the system.

>recieved a digital textbook for college pre-calc
>homework is practice questions from the textbook
>textbook has an answer appendix, giving answers to said practice questions
>basically cheating but I still have to show my work
They're giving degrees away!

How much time do you dedicate to studying/doing academic work? For me it's about 30 hours a week

The final redpill is pretending to be retarded
Ignorance is bliss.