/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8116519
>>8117561
PLEASE, OH PLEASE DO NOT LOOK AT THIS LIST OF PEER REVIEWED PAPERS THAT DEBUNK CLIMATE CHANGE MYTHOLOGY.

Only IPCC Certified for Truth papers count as real papers, all else is just anecdote.

Reference Lists of Skeptical Papers
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
http://www.c3headlines.com/peer-reviewed-research-studies-climate-change-related-other.html
http://chrono.qub.ac.uk/blaauw/cds.html
http://notrickszone.com/248-skeptical-papers-from-2014/
http://notrickszone.com/skeptic-papers-2016/
http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/files/documents/Madhav%20bibliography%20LONG%20VERSION%20Feb%206-07.pdf

a. “Reconciling observations of global temperature change” Richard Lindzen & Constantine Giannitsis. Geophysical Research Letters V 29 (2002) No 12 10.1029/2001GL014074

Analyzes the discrepancy between global mean temperature trends, obtained by satellite
microwave data, and surface temperature measurements.

b. “Compilation and discussion of trends in severe storms in the United States: Popular perception vs climate reality” Robert Balling Jr & Randall Cerveny Natural Hazards V 29 (2003) p. 103-112

Documents the mismatch between popular perceptions, as created by media reports, and
climate reality, which does not show extreme weather as increasing in the USA.

c. “On destructive Canadian Prairie windstorms and severe winters: A climatological assessment in
the context of global warming” Keith Hage Natural Hazards V 29 (2003) p. 207-228

Documents a temporal frequency peak in severe windstorms and associated tornadoes
during the 1920s and 1930s, then a steady decline since 1940 through 1980s. A steep rise
in tornado frequency since 1970 is attributed to increasing awareness and reporting of
tornado activity in recent years, and NOT due to change in tornado climatology.

>>7638869
>hurr durr, I'll resort to ad hominem. Since the graphs of temps data are on Wattsupwiththat.com, that instantly falsifies the data.
> You're like my fundamentalist father who said that anyone who left the Church was an apostate so whatever they said was lies.
Your denial is astonishing. Confronted with specific proof via data, you whine, "Graphs were posted on evil denier website!"

Here's a nice analysis of the results of homogenization and its changes to the warming (or cooling) rate. Note that these are all first class stations; mean their data is pristine. Notice how a tiny 0.18 C/Century trend is changed into a 0.76 trend. That's man made climate change!

FIRST CLASS US STATIONS
History 1874 to 2014
Stations 23
Dataset Unadjusted Adjusted
Average Trend 0.18 0.76 °C/Century
Std. Deviation 0.66 0.54 °C/Century
Max Trend 1.18 1.91 °C/Century
Min Trend -2.00 -0.48 °C/Century
Ave. Length 119 Years

>Trigger warning, this careful statistical analysis is at an evil denier website.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/04/26/temperature-data-review-project-my-submission/