/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15170351
>>15170357
I know why New Glenn is considered a joke, but what's up with the National Team lander?

>>12773634
Well like this anon showed >>12770524
That swampworks has already been developing it for at least a decade, mooncrete has really been researched since the moon landings. NASA did 3 3d printing competitions, they just did a bucket competition for the digging rover and they hired this construction company paired with 2 architecture firms to build off everything they have come up with. The Artemis program won't even land people on the moon until the end of this decade so that is at least 20 years that they will have been working on this. We just are lucky that we are basically through NASA's long term bullshit/they are now being rushed by SpaceX.

>>12728008
Starship obviously or dynetics. I think the national team lander is really bad. Also I have my doubts that SLS will be ready by then