/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6910237
>confusing a function with the analytic continuation of that function

The function you are using is wrong. The Zeta is defined as the analytic continuation of that function, not the function. For negative values you don't just "plug it in" like you are trying to do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function

>>6902628
>grasping at the "bigger scopes" turns objectivity shitty logic in good logic

WUT? I know your trolling, but at least try kid. The argument from ignorance isn't a "science" thing. It is a basic logic thing.